The appeal was disposed of as it was not pressed by the appellant. The notice of motion also perished and was disposed of accordingly. This is a one-line order with no substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 189 of 2009
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 186 of 2009 IN
SUIT NO. 3305 of 2008 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2277 of 2009
Ashraf Khan Pathan
...Appellant
v/s.
Seema Arif Khan Pathan
...Respondents
Shri V.V. Khanolkar for the appellant.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED:- October 14, 2009.
P.C.
Matter is stated to be settled between the parties. Appeal disposed of as not pressed.
Notice of Motion does not survive. Hence, disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Ashraf Khan Pathan
Seema Arif Khan Pathan
SWANTANTER KUMAR
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
