Dismissed
Sital K. Harchandani v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCPIL/133/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.133 OF 2008 Sital K. Harchandani. .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Shri J.S. Chandnani for the Petitioner. Shri P.M. Patil, AGP for State. Shri D.A. Dubey for Union of India.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 12th MARCH, 2009.
P.C.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the
State submits that they will look into the grievance made by the Petitioner in the present Writ Petition and examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
dispose of the matter in accordance with law.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,
J
Sital K. Harchandani
State of Maharashtra
Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court