Public Interest Litigation disposed of after the State Government represented by the AGP stated it would examine allegations and take appropriate steps before issuing orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.71 OF 2009
Baban Govind Tidke. .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri R.S. Datar for the Petitioner. Shri N.P. Deshpande, AGP for State. Shri A.R. Pitale for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 12th MARCH, 2009.
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation submits
that they have already issued stop-work notice. On the other hand, learned AGP appearing for the State submits that they will look into the allegations of the Petitioner made in the present petition and after examining the matter and hearing the petitioner, the State Government will take appropriate steps and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
2
appearing for the State, nothing survives in this Petition and the same is disposed of. The State Government shall act expeditiously to
dispose of the matter in accordance with law.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,
J
Baban Govind Tidke
The Collector
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
