This PIL was rendered infructuous because the State had produced a letter (18.8.2008) addressed to the Administrator of the Industrial Institute, indicating that the underlying matter had been resolved. Consequently, the Public Interest Litigation was disposed of without any substantive adjudication or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 74 OF 2008
Shri Nilesh Bhise. Vs.
.. Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri R.S. Khadapkar i/by S. Sawant for the Petitioner. Shri R.P. Behere, Addl. G. P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms Ratna Manoj i/by Shri D.N. Salvi for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the State has
produced on record a copy of the letter dated 18th August, 2008 addressed by the State to the Industrial Institute, Respondent No.3.
CHIEF JUSTICE
: 1 :
A.P. DESHPANDE, J
Shri Nilesh Bhise
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
