This writ petition seeking reimbursement for payments made to Respondent No.3 was disposed of on the condition that the Petitioners submit a claim, which the State agreed to consider expeditiously.
State to consider the claim for reimbursement expeditiously if submitted by Petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5275 OF 2008
General Secretary, Nagrik Sahayya Kendra & Anr.
Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others.
.. Petitioners
.. Respondents
Shri S.B. Shetye along with Shri Niranjan Mogre for the Petitioners. Shri V.S. Masurkar, GP for State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that after making payment to Respondent No.3, they will move the Government for reimbursement thereof and the Government should be directed to decide the claim for reimbursement expeditiously. The learned Counsel appearing for the State has no objection for the same. If the claim for reimbursement is submitted by the Petitioners, we have no doubt that the State shall consider the same expeditiously. The Petition is disposed of in above terms. No order as to costs.
CHIEF
A.P. DESHPANDE, J
: 1 :
JUSTICE
General Secretary, Nagrik Sahayya Kendra & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Others
Swatanter Kumar
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
