Dismissed
Ramesh Ramchandra Badi and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/45/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.45 OF 2006
Ramesh Ramchandra Badi & Anr. .. Petitioners
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
None present
CORAM : J.N.PATEL &
K.K.TATED, JJ.
DATED : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
1. None for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner wants to place before us
fresh material which he has come across during the
pendency of the matter. Having failed to do so, we
are not able to take any decision in the matter.
3. Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( J.N. PATEL, J )
2
( K.K. TATED, J )
Ramesh Ramchandra Badi & Anr.
Union of India & Ors.
J.N. Patel
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court