The High Court disposed of PIL No. 66 of 2008 after expecting the State to act expeditiously on subject minutes filed following an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDCITION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2008
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena. .. Petitioner Vs The Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
--
Shri Deepak Natu i/by M/s. N. Deepak & Co.for the Petitioner. Shri D.P. Adsule for Respondent No.3. Shri P.M. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.4.
--
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.
In furtherance to the order dated 16th October, 2008, the
minutes are stated to have been filed. We expect the State to act expeditiously and take decision thereon. In view of the above, the PIL is disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena
The Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
