Subhash Mahadeo Chauthai v. Kamal Jijabhau Kayate
Case brief
What is this about?
Application and writ appeal were withdrawn by the applicant. The court dismissed the proceedings as withdrawn without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.95 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.5326 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4982 OF 2007
Shri Subhash Mahadeo Chauthai Vs.
Sou. Kamal Jijabhau Kayate
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. Vinod Jadhav i/by Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the applicant.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 10TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
Counsel for the applicant submits that he has instructions to
withdraw the application as well as the appeal. Accordingly, the application and the appeal do not survive and are dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Shri Subhash Mahadeo Chauthai
Sou. Kamal Jijabhau Kayate
Swatanter Kumar
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court