Dismissed
Mohammed Afzal v. Union of India and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/117/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 50 OF 2008
¶3
Mohammed Afzal ..Petitioner
versus
¶4
Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents
¶5
Ms. Prachi Khandge i/b. Mr. M. M. Vashi for
the Petitioner.
¶6
Mr. D. A. Nalawade, GP for the State.
¶7
Mr. H. K. Vardhan for the Union of India.
¶8
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND
S. A. BOBDE, J.
¶9
DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008.
¶10
P.C.
¶11
. Learned counsel appearing for the State
¶12
submits that they will examine the grievance raised
by the petitioner and take action in accordance with
law. In view of this statement, nothing survives in
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mohammed Afzal
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court