Mahesh Sharma v. Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay disposed of PIL No. 86 of 2007 by dismissing the petitioner's petition as withdrawn without liberty to file a fresh suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 86 OF 2007
Mr. Mahesh Sharma.... ..... Petitioner.
Versus
Union of India and Anr... .... Respondents.
Mr. Ankus Bansal for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to take
such steps as may be permissible to him in law. This
petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Mr. Mahesh Sharma
Union of India and Anr
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court