The Stock Exchange v. Brij B.Nahak, and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn by counsel after appropriate order was passed by respondents, subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.2338 OF 2000
The Stock Exchange, Mumbai. Vs. Brij Bandhu Nahak & Ors.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Mr.Sagar Divekar i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Chauhan i/b. T.C. Kaushik for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. P. Das for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
August 8, 2007 .
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the
Writ Petition in view of the fact that an appropriate order has been passed by the Respondents. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
The Stock Exchange, Mumbai
Brij Bandhu Nahak & Ors.
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court