Disposed
Rakesh Krushnaji Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/8/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.8 OF 2007
Manubhai Paragji Vashi and another Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary to the Government & others
..Petitioners.
..Respondents.
Mr. M.P. Vashi i/b M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioners. Mr. K.R. Belosey, Government Pleader for the State. Mr. A.G. Damle for Respondent No.3. Mr. R.M. Haridas for Respondent No.7.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 16th August, 2007.
P.C. :
The State to file proper affidavit clearly elucidating their stand in regard to the implementation of the judgment of the Supreme Court, providing of infrastructure and the consequential legislative steps which are to be taken by them. This affidavit shall be filed within two weeks from today. In the event no affidavit is filed, the Secretary, Law and Judiciary shall remain present in Court on the next date of hearing.
2
The affidavit to be filed within two weeks with an
advocate copy to all the learned counsel appearing for the parties including the High Court which is Respondent No.2 in these proceedings. Respondent No. 2 shall file its affidavit in response thereto stating the various steps that have been taken within two weeks thereafter.
We make it clear that all the concerned should carry out the directions contained in this order without fail.
Stand over to 19th September, 2007.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Manubhai Paragji Vashi and another
The State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court