The Court, noting the State counsel's assurance to examine the petitioner's grievance within three months, held the public interest litigation infructuous and disposed of it.
The petition was found infructuous and disposed of; the Respondent to abide by the State's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.25 OF 2007
Shivaji Hanumant Sugare Vs. Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur & Others
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Ms. Poonam Kandale i/b Mr. N.R. Bubna for the Petitioner. Mr. V.P. Malvankar, AGP for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
23rd August, 2007.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the State states that they will look
into the grievance made by the Petitioner in the present writ petition and pass appropriate orders within three months from today. On the statement made by counsel appearing for the State,
this petition becomes infructuous and disposed of as such. The Respondent will abide by the statement.
There shall be no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Shivaji Hanumant Sugare
Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
