A PIL filed by Bhimshakti Sanghatna was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner sought liberty to file an appropriate petition later.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 130 OF 2007
Bhimshakti Sanghatna... ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents.
Mr. P. B. Shah for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.P.Malvankar, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to file
appropriate petition as person against whom the order
of transfer dated 27th July, 2007 has been passed has
not even approached the court. This petition is,
accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed.
Sd/-
CHIEFJUSTICE
Sd/-
-: 2 :-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Bhimshakti Sampada
The State of Maharashtra
Swatantar Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court