The High Court at Bombay disposed of a notice of motion seeking withdrawal of a writ petition without recording any substantive arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 74 OF 2005
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2936 OF 2003
Smt. Manjula Yadav.. ... ...... Petitioner.
Versus
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Ors... Respondents.
Mr.Sakhardande with Ms.Nutan Moily for the Petitioner.
Mr.Prashant N.Sutar i/by M/s.S.I.Shah & Co.,
for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw this notice of motion with liberty
to take appropriate steps. This notice of motion is,
accordingly, disposed of with liberty as prayed.
Sd/-
CHIEFJUSTICE
Sd/-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Smt. Manjula Yadav
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court