Single judge Bench allowed Civil Applications for delay, restoration, and stay direction without reasoning.
Delay is condoned. Appeal is restored. Civil Application for stay is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4640 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4914 of 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.18046 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14536 OF 2006 IN L. A. R. NO.89 OF 2002
The State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Ganpat Laxman Mhatre (deceased) through his legal representatives 1. Smt. Shantibai Ganpat Mhatre and others
..Applicants.
..Respondents.
Mr. K.K. Tated, AGP for the Applicants. Mr. Umashankar Upadhye i/b Mr. S.G. Surana for the Respondents.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 10th September, 2007.
P.C. :
As there is no opposition by counsel appearing for the Respondents, the Civil Applications for delay and restoration are allowed. The delay is condoned. The Appeal is restored. List the Appeal after six weeks.
The Civil Application for stay is also allowed in terms of
prayer clause (b).
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
The State of Maharashtra and others
Ganpat Laxman Mhatre (deceased) through his legal representative Smt. Shantibai Ganpat Mhatre and others
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
