COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
Applications for delay and restoration allowed; delay condoned; Appeal restored; Civil Application for stay allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4639 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4912 of 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.18045 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14529 OF 2006 IN L. A. R. NO.88 OF 2002
The State of Maharashtra and others Vs.
Narayan Sitaram Mhatre and others
..Applicants.
..Respondents.
Mr. K.K. Tated, AGP for the Applicants. Mr. Umashankar Upadhye i/b Mr. S.G. Surana for the Respondents.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 10th September, 2007.
P.C. :
As there is no opposition by counsel appearing for the Respondents, the Civil Applications for delay and restoration are
allowed. The delay is condoned. The Appeal is restored. List
the Appeal after six weeks.
The Civil Application for stay is also allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
State of Maharashtra and others
Narayan Sitaram Mhatre and others
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
