This court allowed civil applications for condoning delay, restoring the second appeal, and granting a stay in terms of prayer clause (b) due to non-opposition by the respondent.
Delay condoned; Appeal restored and listed after six weeks; Stay allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4638 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4910 of 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.18037 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14511 OF 2006 IN L. A. R. NO.25 OF 2002
The State of Maharashtra and others Vs.
Kundalik Balu Pavanekar and others
..Applicants.
..Respondents.
Mr. K.K. Tated, AGP for the Applicants. Mr. Umashankar Upadhye i/b Mr. S.G. Surana for the Respondents.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 10th September, 2007.
P.C. :
As there is no opposition by counsel appearing for the Respondents, the Civil Applications for delay and restoration are
allowed. The delay is condoned. The Appeal is restored. List the Appeal after six weeks.
The Civil Application for stay is also allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
State of Maharashtra and others
Kundalik Balu Pavanekar and others
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
