Ravish Rafiq Kharbe v. the S.E.M. Bombay and Another.
Bombay HCWP/861/1994
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No substantive content available; order appears to be an office note or internal memorandum regarding removal of objections.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
:1:
¶2
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 861 OF 1994
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2351 OF 1999
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2145 OF 1999
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1495 OF 2000
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1688 OF 2000
¶3
(Sr.No.8 to 12)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
of Coram, appearance, Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
¶4
CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 07/6/2006.
¶5
P.C.
¶6
1. Office objections to be removed
within a period of four weeks from
today failing which matters to stand
dismissed for non prosecution without
any further order of this court.
¶7
(R. S. MOHITE, J.)
Coram
AI extract
R. S. Mohite
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court