The single judge rejected an application for anticipatory bail. Finding the applicant encashed banker bearer cheques of teachers without issue of money, forged signatures and led to false FIRs, the application was summarily dismissed as having no substance.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1642 OF 2006
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.A.P.Mundergi with Indrajeet
Joshi for the applicant.
Mr.Y.S.Shinde APP for the State.
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
Date : 6th June, 2006.
PC
1. This is an application for
grant of anticipatory bail. The
applicant is shown as an accused
in C.R.No.I-133/2006 registered
by Naupada Police station, Thane
for the offences punishable
under Sections 420, 409, 465,
467, 468, 471, 474 r/w Sec.34 of
IPC. Perusal of the record
indicates that the present
applicant has encashed bearer
provident fund cheques of 2
teachers by name Shri Sadanand
Phatak and Sou.Vijaya Khandekar.
The police have recorded the
: 2 :
statement of Sou.Vijaya |
|---|
Khandekar. Sou.Vijaya Khandekar |
categorically states in her |
statement that she has not |
received the money. The entire |
picture indicates that there are |
several such instances. In some |
cases, the signature of the |
person was forged and his |
identity was not clear. It |
appears that number of persons |
of the department were involved |
in this matter. Their names |
have to be found in the course |
of investigation. No substance |
in the application. Rejected. |
(R.S.Mohite,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for grant of anticipatory bail admitting a false statement of recover of money from teachers by encashing their bearer provident fund cheques merits acceptance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
State
R.S.Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court