Dismissed
Rajesh N. Lund v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1693/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1693 OF 2006
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Vishal Thadani h/for Mrs.Veena
Thadani for the applicants.
Mr.R.V.Saste APP for the State.
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
Date : 6th June, 2006.
PC
1. Heard both sides. APP makes
a statement that no crime has
been registered against the
present applicants. Application
is therefore, dismissed with a
direction that in case if any
crime is registered and the
applicants are required to be
arrested, they may be given 72
hours notice in writing.
(R.S.Mohite,J)
Mrs. Veena Thadani
The State
R.S.Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court