This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.[1].
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.708 OF 2000
Dr.Sarita Krishna Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra
and 4 Ors. ...Respondents.
....
Mr.Sachin Thorat i/b. Mr.V.M.Thorat, Advocate for
the Petitioner.
Mr.Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P., for the
Respondent-State.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2006.
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that
the above Petition has become infructuous as of
today. Hence, Rule stands discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Dr.Sarita Krishna Kumar
State of Maharashtra
DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court