Disposed
Satish S.Sonalkar v. Principal, New Law College and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1321/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.[1].
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1321 OF 2000
Mr.Satish Sadanand Sonalkar ...Petitioner.
Versus
The Principal, New Law College,
Mahim & 5 Ors. ...Respondents.
Mr.D.Brijesh i/b. A.S.Khandeparkar, Advocate for
the Petitioner.
Mr.M.D.Naik, A.G.P. for Respondent No.6-State.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2006.
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and learned A.G.P. for the State. The learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw
the Petition. Hence, Rule stands discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Mr.Satish Sadanand Sonalkar
The Principal, New Law College, Mahim
DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court