Disposed
C.v.Upadhya v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1851/1997
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay hearing a writ petition granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the rule stands discharged with no substantive decision on merits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
.[1].
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO.1851 OF 1997
¶4
Chandrasekhar Vasant Upadhaye ...Petitioner.
¶5
Versus
¶6
Union of India and 4 Ors. ...Respondents.
¶7
....
Mr.A.S.Rao i/b. S.P.Saxena, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
¶8
Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondents.
....
¶9
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
¶10
DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2006.
¶11
P.C.:
¶12
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and the respondents. The learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.
Hence, Rule stands discharged.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Chandrasekhar Vasant Upadhaye
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
DR SRADHAKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court