Dismissed
Progressive Waterproofing Company v. Mun.Corpn.for Greater Bombay and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/478/1999
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.[1].
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.478 OF 1999
Progressive Waterproofing
Company ...Petitioner.
Versus
Municipal Corporation for
Greater Bombay and 3 Ors. ...Respondents.
....
Mrs.Vidya Merchant i/b. M/s. Kishore Thakordas &
Co. for the Petitioner.
Mr.G.V.Murti, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
....
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2006.
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and learned counsel for respondent No.3. In view
of the interlocutory order dated 30th March, 1999
passed by this Court, the learned counsel for the
petitioner states that the petitioner is
not-pressing the above petition, and seeks leave
to withdraw the same. Hence, Rule stands
discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Progressive Waterproofing Company
Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay
Round 1st Respondent
S.Radhakrishnan
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court