Disposed
Dr.Sonali N.Jukar v. B.M.C.and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/504/1997
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner raised a writ petition which was found to be infructuous as of the date of hearing. The petition was then discharged and disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
WRIT PETITION NO.504 OF 1997
¶3
Dr.Sonali Narendra Jukar .. Petitioner
V/s
Bombay Municipal Corporation & Anr. .. Respondents
¶4
Mr.S.B.Thorat for the Petitioner.
¶5
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
¶6
DATE : 16th November, 2006.
P.C.:
¶7
. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that as of
today the Petition has become infructuous. Hence the
Rule stands discharged. Petition stands disposed of.
¶8
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Dr.Sonali Narendra Jukar
- respondent
Bombay Municipal Corporation
Coram
AI extract
S.Radhakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court