Writ petition for permission to withdraw was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This case involves no substantive legal proposition.
Permission to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PIL/ WRIT PETITION NO. 31 OF 2006
Prakash Vasantrao Deshmukh & Anr. ...Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
Shri H.S. Venegavkar for the Petitioners.
Shri P.I. Khemani, Assistant Government Pleader, for
Respondent Nos.1 to 5.
Shri S.S. Redkar for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., &
V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 14, 2006.
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
Prakash Vasantrao Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
H.S. Bedi
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
