Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the PIL following the disposition of related PIL No. 184 of 2004. The court granted permission, dismissed the petition with liberty, and recorded no substantive legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 52 OF 2004
Mrs. Suman Vishwanath Pholane and another ...Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
Mr. B.M.Raikar for the petitioners. Mr. S.A. Dubey for respondent No.1. Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.2.
CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2006 .
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition in view of the order passed by us today in PIL No. 184 of 2004. Permission granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
Mrs. Suman Vishwanath Pholane and another
Union of India and others
H.S. BEDI, C.J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
