Nitin Shankar Deshpande and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In PIL No. 3 of 2006, the Bombay HC allowed the petitioners to represent at the State Government hearing regarding a lake conversion resolution. The writ petition was disposed of while keeping raised issues open for future litigation.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners permitted to represent before the State Government; writ petition disposed of; issues kept open.