On a petition seeking leave to withdraw, the Bombay High Court granted leave given that the tribunal was already seized of the matter, permitting the withdrawal of the PIL.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PIL Writ Petition No.53 of 2006
Karveer Kamgar Sangh Petitioner. Vs The State of Maharashtra & ors ... Respondents
Ms. Soma Singh i/b Vivek Sharma for petitioner Mr A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate for M/s Y K Legal for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM: H.S. BEDI, C.J. , & V.M.KANADE, J.
DATE: 13th December, 2006.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition since the tribunal is already seized of the matter. Leave granted. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn. We also request the tribunal to take a decision in the matter within a period of six months from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE.
V.M.KANADE, J.
Karveer Kamgar Sangh
The State of Maharashtra
H.S. BEDI
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
