This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 148 OF 2005
Shri Bellaram K. Patil & ors.] .. Petitioners
Versus
Maharashtra Industrial Development]
Corporation Limited & Ors.] .. Respondents
Mr. R.P. Lote for the petitioners.
Mr. Kiran Gandhi i/b M/s.Little & Co. for respondent
No.1.
Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP, for respondent Nos.3, 6.
Mr. A.A. George respondent No.4.
Mr. S.G. Surana for Intervenor.
CORAM: R.M. LODHA &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2006
P.C. :
.Mr.R.P.Lote, learned counsel for the
petitioners prays for withdrawal of this Writ Petition
with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition with all
necessary documents.
2.Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty, as prayed.
Sd/-
: 2 :
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Shri Bellaram K. Patil & ors.
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Limited & Ors.
R.M. LODHA
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court