Disposed
Mr.Sushan Kunjuraman v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/137/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 137 OF 2004
Shri Sushan Kunjuraman.
] .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.] .. Respondents
Mr. S.B. Shetye for the petitioner.
Mr. P.P. Chavan - Amicus Curiae.
Mr. Nitin Deshpande, AGP, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 12TH JANAURY, 2006
P.C. :
1.In the order dated October 10, 2005 it is
noticed that pursuant to the directions of this Court,
290 toilets have already been constructed and remaining
42 toilets shall be constructed shortly.
2.In view thereof, we are satisfied that nothing
further is required to be done. The Writ Petition (PIL)
is disposed of accordingly.
: 2 :
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Shri Sushan Kunjuraman
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Lodha
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court