The High Court of Bombay disposed of an appeal as infructuous since the underlying suit had been transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal and proceedings were concluded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE
APPEAL NO.784 OF 1997 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.594 OF 1995 IN SUIT NO.954 OF 1987
vs.
Respondents
Mr.U.J.Makhija for the appellants.
Mr.Sangram Suryavanshi i/b.M/s.Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the respondents.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ . DATED : 17th January 2006
P.C.
In view of the events that had taken place subsequent to the filing of the appeal, the appeal has become infructuous. It is so because the Suit came to
be transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal and we are
informed that the proceedings have been disposed of.
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Ms. G. Sukumari & ors.
The Bank of Tokyo Limited & ors.
R.M. LODHA
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
