Disposed
Raju S. Uerhani v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/7/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
P.I.L. NO.7 OF 2006
Shri Raju S. Uerhani.
vs.
State of Maharashtra & ors.
Petitioner Respondents
Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar i/b.Mr.N.N.Shimpi for the petitioner.
Mr.R.M.Sawant, Government for the respondent no.1.
Mr.A.S.Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.2.
Mr.A.A.Garge i/b.Mr.R.S.Apte for the respondent no.3.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ . DATED : 1st February 2006
P.C.
Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition challenging the
specific case of award of contract for collection of
octroi in future, if necessary.
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Shri Raju S. Uerhani
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Lodha
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court