Revansidhappa @ Bapu Gurusiddhappa Loni v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
An application for bail was filed by an accused in a murder case involving business rivalry. The High Court rejected the bail application due to strong motive, last seen testimony, and circumstantial evidence placing the applicant at the scene.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2159 OF 2006
Revansidhappa @ Bapu Gurusiddhappa Loni )..Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra )..Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.A.P.Mundargi Sr.Advocate i/by
Ganesh Gole for the applicant.
Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State.
Mr.S.S.Salunkhe, Advocate for the
original Complainant.
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
Date : 20.6.2006.
PC
1. This is an application for
grant of bail. The present
applicant who is shown as an
accused alongwith 10 other
persons in C.R.No.261/2005
registered by Faujdar Chawdi
Police station, Solapur, for
offences punishable under
Sections 320, 201, 120-B, 364,
365 & 368 of IPC. On perusing
the material collected by the
prosecution during the
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for bail under Section 439 CrPC can be granted when prima facie material indicates the applicant's involvement in a death case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Revansidhappa @ Bapu Gurusiddhappa Loni
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.S. Mohite
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court