This court wpa directed state to consider petitioner leave encashment claim within three months citing tribunal failure to adjudicate.
Respondents to consider petitioner's claim for encashment of earned leave within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
Writ Petition No.4l87 of 2005
Shri Pundalik A Deshmukh.. petitioner
vs
The State of Mah and ors.. respondents
Mr.P.A.Deshmukh petitioner in person
Mr.C.R.Sonawane AGP for State
CORAM;A.P.SHAH & D.Y CHANDRACHUD JJ.
Dated l6.8.2005
P C:
. Heard parties.
. The prayer for pay and allowance for 85 days is
rejected by the tribunal and we do not see any
reason to interfere with the same.
. As regards the grievance of the petitioner about
non payment of encashment of earned leave, it seems
that the tribunal has not dealt with the same. We
direct the respondents to consider the claim of the
petitioner for encashment of earned leave in
accordance with law and pass appropriate order
within three months from today. Petition is
disposed of.
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
-8-
-9-
-10-
-11-
-12-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether tribunal justified in rejecting prayer for pay and allowance for 85 days
Whether tribunal addressed grievance regarding non-payment of encashment of earned leave
Shri Pundalik A Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
A.P. Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court