Petitioners withdrew part of the writ petition; remaining petition is dismissed as no instruction was received from petitioner no. 2.
Petition dismissed as withdrawal instructions were not received from petitioner no. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Appellate Side
Writ Petition No.255l of 2005
Shri Ganesh Sahakari Grahak
Sanstha Maryadit Kolhapur & anr. Petitioners
vs
State of Mar & others ... Respondents
Mr Uday P Warunjikar for petitioners
CORAM: A.P.SHAH & D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ.
Dated 9.8.2005
P.C:
. Mr Warunjikar, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners informs that as far as petitioner no l
is concerned counsel has instructions to withdraw
the petition, however,he has no instruction such
instructions from petitioner no. 2. It appears
that the entire matter is worked out and nothing
survives in the matter. Hence petition is
dismissed.
Shri Ganesh Sahakari Grahak Sanstha Maryadit Kolhapur
anr
State of Maharashtra
others
A.P. Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court