Appellant sought stay. Court adjourned matter for respondent's counsel to submit time, restored stay pending hearing.
Stay of order restored till next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-128/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-46/DLI/2016
Shri Deepak Dhembla … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mohinder Madan, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. S.P. Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 23.07.2019
MP-128/DLI/2016 (Stay)
The learned counsel for the respondent sought some time. The learned counsel for the appellant has no objection. He has submitted a copy of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of UOI vs. Hazi Mastan Mirza, dated 23rd February, 1984 and stated that he would be relying on the same.
Adjourned at the request of the respondent.
The stay is restored till the next date of hearing.
List on 4th September, 2019.
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi,
23rd July, 2019
M
FPA-46/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
UOI vs. Hazi Mastan MirzaReferred¶11
UOI vs. Hazi Mastan Mirza, dated 23rd February, 1984
Deepak Dhembla
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Ananya Ray
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
