Disposed

FPA-39/DLI/2016 of Shri Rajeev Verma v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi

ATFP23 Feb 2017FPA-39/DLI/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal noted conflicting valuation reports regarding the market rent of a seized residential property. It held the appeal premature and directed the appellant to continue depositing Rs. 70,000 per month as rental charge until the appeal's disposal.

What did the court decide?

Appeal held expatiated; continued deposit of Rs. 70,000/month directed pending disposal.

FPA-39/DLI/2016 of Shri Rajeev Verma v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi — ATFP (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-107/DLI/2016 (Addl. Grounds) MP-108/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-39/DLI/2016

¶3

Shri Rajeev Verma

¶4

… Appellant/Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent

¶7

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶8

For the appellant	: Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate Sh. D.S Bisht, Joint Commissioner
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶9

ORDER 23.02.2017

¶10

FPA-39/DLI/2016

¶11

Valuation report has been filed by the respondent. It is taken on record. It is stated that the market rent of the said property is Rs.1 lakh 12 thousand. On the other hand Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate counsel for the appellant submits that the market rent of the said property is less than Rs. 70 thousands. It is a residential property and any part of the property is not used for commercial purpose. There are two versions given y the parties.

¶12

We are of the view that the appeal is expatiated. The order has already passed to deposit of sum of Rs. 70,000/-(Seventy thousand) per month as the rental charge for the said property may continue till the disposal of the appeal. The order is passed accordingly. The appellant shall

¶13

FPA-39/DLI/2016

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

keep on depositing the said amount already fixed during the pendency of appeal.

¶16

List the appeal as well as pending application for final hearing on 20^th April, 2017.

¶17

Both the parties may file the written submission on or before the

¶18

next date of hearing.

¶19

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶20

(G.C. Mishra) Member

(B.K. Bansal)

Member

New Delhi,

23^rd February, 2017

¶25

‘s’

¶26

FPA-39/DLI/2016

¶27

Page 2 of 2

FPA-39/DLI/2016 of Shri Rajeev Verma v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-39/DLI/2016 of Shri Rajeev Verma v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases