Buragadda Ramakrishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

SIMHADRI JHANSI LAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATA SIVAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 16-7, MUZAVAR STREET, HARIKABUILDING ROAD, KONDAPALLI, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

2

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondents 4 and 5 in demanding the petitioner to vacate the land in an extent of Ac. 4. 39 cents which is subject matter of ATC No. 2/2018 on the file of AP (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act 1956 cum I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Machilipatnam and schedule property therein while the litigation with regard to petitioner's tenancy rights based upon the lease agreement dt. 27.9.2016 on the said land as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of tenancy rights in the said extent of land in i he interest of justice and to pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the tenancy rights over an extent of Ac. 4. 39 cents which is subject matter of ATC No. 2/2018 on the file of AP (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act 1956 cum I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Machilipatnam and schedule property therein and to pass

¶23

IA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in W.P No. 12206/2019 dt: 28.08.2019

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26

1.YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

1.GP FOR HOME (AP)

¶29

2.V V L N SARMA

¶30

The Court made the following:

¶31

3

¶32

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

¶33

WRIT PETITION No.12206 OF 2019

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

¶36

“….to issue, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondents 4 and 5 in demanding the petitioner to vacate the land in an extent of Ac. 4.39 cents which is subject matter of ATC No. 2/2018 on the file of AP (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act 1956 cum I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Machilipatnam and schedule property therein while the litigation with regard to petitioner's tenancy rights based upon the lease agreement dt. 27.9.2016 on the said land as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of tenancy rights in the said extent of land in i he interest of justice and to pass…”

¶37

None appeared for the writ petitioner.

¶38

Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader

¶39

for Home and learned counsel representing Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, learned counsel for unofficial respondent No.6 are in attendance.

¶40

Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that basing on the report of Smt.Simhadri Jhansi Lakshmi i.e., unofficial respondent No.6, police registered a case in Cr.No.104/2018 against one Mr.Buragadda Yesubabu and others for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 379, 506 r/w 34 IPC on 22.05.2018 and conducted investigation. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed before the learned Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate at Machilipatnam vide C.C.No.11/2019, which was referred to the National Lok-Adalat on 13.12.2025. Both

¶41

4

¶42

parties attended the National Lok-Adalat on 13.12.2025 and the matter

¶43

was settled before the National Lok-Adalat and an awarded was also passed. In the light of the said award, the accused were acquitted under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C. and therefore, the writ petition has becomes infructuous.

¶44

In the light of above submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, which disclose that the petitioner and the unofficial respondent settled the matter amicably before the National Lok-Adalat on 13.12.2025, the writ petition is closed at the stage of admission without going into merits of the case.

¶45