Dismissed

N Sreenivasula Reddy v. the State of Andhara Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC22 Oct 2024WP(AT)/552/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition (AT) No. 552 of 2022, which challenged provisional seniority lists of Forest Section Officers. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs and closed pending related petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw granted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

N Sreenivasula Reddy Vs the State of Andhara… — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI oS

¶3

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶4

WP(AT) NO: 552 OF 2022

¶5

Between:

¶6

N. Sreenivasula Reddy, S/o. N.Ramachandra Reddy, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Forest Section Officer, Peddakambalur Section, Chalama Range, (W.L) Nandyal Division, Nandyal, Kurnool District, Andhra^Pradesh.

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

AND

¶9

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Environment, Forests, Science and Technology, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶10

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force) » j State of A.P., Sankurathri Residency, M.G. Inner Road, Agarthavarapadu, Guntur, Guntur District-522509.

¶11

The Chief Conservator of Forests, Kurnool Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶12

The Divisional Forest Officer, (W.L) Nandyal Division, Nandyal, Kurnool District.

¶13

S. Zeshan Ahamed Taheer, Age and Son of not known.^{ForestSection} Officer, FSD, Atmakur, Kurnool District, A.P.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to and connected with the impugned provisional seniority list of Forest Section^Officers of Kurnool Circle Unit in Rc. No.04/2017/M. 1 dated 8-2-2018 and the consequential rejection proceedings in Re. No.04/2017/M. 1 dated^24-112018 of the 3 rd Respondent and set aside the same by declaring them as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Rule 33 of AP State and Subordinate^{ServiceRulesand}

¶16

¶17

also Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the Applicant is senior to Unofficial Respondent.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. VENKATA KRISHNAIAH

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI SYED MUSHTAQ^AHMED

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

¶22

APHC010578542022

¶23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶24

[3459]

¶25

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶26

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶27

PRESENT

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶29

WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 552/2022

¶30

Between:

¶31

N Sreenivasula Reddy ...PETITIONER

¶32

AND

¶33

The State Of Andhara Pradesh and Others

¶34

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶35

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶36

1.G VENKATA KRISHNAIAH

¶37

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶38

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

¶39

2.SYED MUSHTAQ AHMED

¶40

The Court made the following:

¶41

¶42

JS,J • W.P.(AT).No.552of 2022 ^

¶43

ORDER:

¶44

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to

¶45

withdraw the writ petition.

¶46

Permission is accorded.

¶47

Accordingly, the Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as^{withdrawn.Noorder}

¶48

as to costs.

¶49

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^{shallstandclosed.}

¶50

//TRUE COPY//

¶51

Sd/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶52

To,

¶53

SECTION OFFICER

¶54

One CC to Sri G. Venkata Krishnaiah, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] ^

¶55

One CC to Sri Syed Mushtaq Ahmed, Advocate (OPUC)

¶56

Three C.D. Copies.

Cnr

HIGH COURT

DATED:23/10/2024

ORDER

WP(AT).No.552 of 2022

¶62

DISMISSING THE WP(AT) AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

N Sreenivasula Reddy v. the State of Andhara Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N Sreenivasula Reddy v. the State of Andhara Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S Chenchu Krishnama Raju Vs Sri Ravindra Babu

C Mahaboob Vali Vs D Nagendra Kumar,I.P.S

S.Krishna Rao Vs Smt. Krishna Kumari

P.Jyothi Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Y v Rama Swamy Vs the Government of Andhra Pradesh

Shaik Allauddin Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh