Contempt case alleging disobedience of Tribunal orders; petitioner, having filed a writ petition seeking restoration of seniority as School Assistant, sought closure. The High Court closed the contempt case with liberty to pursue the writ petition, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE (AT) NO: 111 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, r/w. 17 of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 for willful, deliberately and intentionally disobeying the orders of this Honourable Tribunal in O.A.No.3959/2016, dt. 25-10-2016.
Between:
...Applicant
AND
(Respondent No. 2 impleaded as per Court Order dt.18.03.2024 vide I.A.No.1/2024 in C.C. (AT) No. Ill of 2023)
...Respondent/Contemnor
f
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G SEENA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VADAPALLI RAMESH
The Court made the following Order:
APHC010259502023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 0M0 AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3459]
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 111/2023
Between:
S Chenchu Krishnama Raju ...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Ravindra Babu and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G SEENA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.VADAPALLI RAMESH
The Court made the following:
i
3
^ C.C.(AT).No.lllof 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, pending the contempt case, the petitioner has preferred a writ petitionvideW.P.No.14652of2022 seeking restoration of seniority in the category of School Assistant and requests to close the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case (AT) is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue W.P.No.14652of2022.Noorderasto costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendingshallstandclosed.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRY
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
SM
sree
HIGH COURT DATED:22/10/2024
ORDER
CC(AT).No.111 of 2023
^1- andS^
g 0 6 FEB 2025 S
^ ^ Current Section . 'v
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE (AT) WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S Chenchu Krishnama Raju
Sri Ravindra Babu
Sri P.V.S.S. Murthy
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
