Disposed

C Mahaboob Vali v. D Nagendra Kumar,I.P.S

Andhra Pradesh HC21 Oct 2024CC(AT)/387/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt case alleging willful violation of a Tribunal order dated 14.12.2017 in O.A.No.3310/2017. Counsel for the petitioner submitted the order had been complied with; the High Court recorded the submission and closed the contempt case without costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case (AT) No.387 of 2023 closed; miscellaneous petitions, if any, also closed; no order as to costs.

C Mahaboob Vali Vs D Nagendra Kumar,I.P.S — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE (AT) NO: 387 OF 2023

¶6

Contempt case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating^{anddisobeyingthe} Orders of the High Court dated 14.12.2017 in O.A.No.3310/2017.

¶7

Between:

¶8

C Mahaboob Vali, S/o Khaja Mia Sab, Age 54 Years, Occ.^Armed Reserve Head Constable (No. 766), Presently working^{atDistrictArmed} Reserve, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

D Nagendra Kumar,I.P.S, Deputy Inspector General of^{Police,Kurnool} Range, Kurnool.

¶12

...Respondent

¶13

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M SRIKANTH

¶14

Counsel for the Respondents:

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

APHC010264132023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶20

[3459]

¶21

TUESDAY. THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶22

PRESENT

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 387/2023

¶24

Between:

¶25

C Mahaboob Vali ...PETITIONER

¶26

AND

¶27

D Nagendra Kumar I P S ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶28

1.M SRIKANTH

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶30

¶31

The Court made the following:

¶32

¶33

C.C.(AT).No.387of 2023

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.3310 of 2017 has been complied with.

¶36

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case (AT) is closed. No order as to costs.

¶37

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^{shallstandclosed.}

¶38

SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Sri D Nagendra Kumar, I.P.S, Deputy Inspector General of Police Kurnool Range, Kurnool.

¶43

One CC to Sri. M Srikanth, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Three CD Copies

vna

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/10/2024

ORDER

CC(AT).No.387 of 2023

¶50

^ 1 2 FEB 2025 |
. Current Section

¶51

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE(AT) WITHOUT COSTS

C Mahaboob Vali v. D Nagendra Kumar,I.P.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C Mahaboob Vali v. D Nagendra Kumar,I.P.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.V. Raja Rao Vs Sri Y. Madhusudhan Reddy

C Vanitha Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

V.Seshu Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

S Chenchu Krishnama Raju Vs Sri Ravindra Babu

S.Krishna Rao Vs Smt. Krishna Kumari

K.Jagadeswara Rao Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh