The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking regularization of service in a college as abated because the petitioner died during pendency and no legal representatives came forward to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010103052018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 4543/2018
Between:
S.V.S.Subrahmanayam,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
KGR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as abated on account of the petitioner's death without legal representatives stepping in?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
S.V.S.Subrahmanayam
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
