Writ petition seeking promotion to Head Nurse post despite pending writ petition was taken up for hearing; counsel for both sides agreed the matter had become infructuous, and the court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12409 OF 2017
Between:
S. Parvathi, W/o. Sethuram, Aged about 57 years, Occ; Staff Nurse Srinivasam Dispensary, T.T. Devastanam, Tirupati, ChittoorDistrict. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam, Rep. by its ExecutiveOfficer, Tirupati, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring Memo ROC. NO.TL2/3292/2008 dated 18.7.2014, rejecting the claim of the Petitionerforpromotiontothe post of Head Nurse is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona l and consequently to direct the Respondent to consider the claim of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Head Nursewithoutreferencetothe pendency of Writ Petition No.9064/2013, as petitionerbelongs to 1986
batch staff nurse with effect from the completing the punishment period with all consequential benefits.
^
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 15411 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Memo ROC. NO.TL2/3292/2008 dated 18.7.2014, with a direction to the Respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Head Nurse without reference to the pendency of the Writ Petition No.9064/2013 forthwith in the existing vacancy.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI N.CHIDAMBARA SASTRY (SC
FOR TTD)
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
N APHC010674132017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY .THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12409/2017
Between:
S. Parvathi
...PETITIONER
AND
The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.NAYAKAWADI RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondent: 1 .A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD)
The Court made the following:
%
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.SNChidambara Sastry, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the matter has become infructuous, which fact was also not denied by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
- Considering the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this WritPetitionshallstand
closed.
SD/- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To, SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.12409 of 2017
^fANDW;^
'x 10 MAR 2025 eoi
iO^ ^ Current becuon ^
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
S. Parvathi
The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam
V.SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
