Writ petition seeking continuation in service with emoluments till superannuation was dismissed as infructuous, as submitted by respondents' counsel and not denied by petitioner's counsel. No order on merits; no proposition of general application arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 189Q4 OF 2017
Between:
D.S.Sreepathy, S/o. Late D. V. Sreenivasulu, aged 60 years Occ ; Exem^ployee, R/o. 5-4, Rajaka Street, Oldpet Palamaneru,ChittoorDistrict-517 ...PETITIONER AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing Roc. No. DAI A/4006/2013 dated 26-5-2015 and Roc.No.El/9953/2012 dated 8-2-2017 issued by respondent no.2, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same by treating the petitioner as continuing in service till the date of his superannuation duly paying all the emoluments benefits, attached thereto and pay the same.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 23043 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing of writ petition.
I.A, NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 53601 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the above writ petition for final hearing at an early date preferably in the month of December 2017.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AMMAJI NETTEM
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A. SUMANTH { SC FOR TTD)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010066582017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 18904/2017
Between:
D.s.sreepathy
...PETITIONER
AND
Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams 3 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.AMMAJI NETTEM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1 .A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD)
2.70537/MR. A.K. JAYA PRAKASH RAO
The Court made the following:
fv
ORDER;
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Sumanth,learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitsthatthematterhas become infructuous, which fact was also not denied by the learned counselfor the petitioner.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this WritPetitionshallstand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P.VENKAT RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR SE^flWOFFlCER
rriVrfCK
To.
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED;06/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No. 18904 of 2017
g 0 3 OCT 2024
Current Section *
WITHOUrcoSTs'^ '^' "^'^f^UCUTOUS
D.S. Sreepathy
Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
