Petitioners challenging temple tender notice via writ petition were granted closure when the tender process was not pursued further, yet petitioners continued on contract.
The Writ Petition is closed. Petitioners are at liberty to approach the Court if the cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3333]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25670 OF 2015
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
Petition is filed under Article 226 of the ConstitutionofIndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,theHigh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ orderordirectionmorein the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2" respondent in issuing Tender Notice No.1/2015, dated 15-06-2015 published in Eanadu daily News Paper in calling tenders for providing cleaning works and its maintenance and providing facilitymanagement services through modern methods by disengaging the services of the petitioners who are working as Labour on Contract Systemfrom 01-062008 onwards in the Nitya Annadanam wing of respondentTemple is concerned as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violativeofArts. 14and16of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as workers on contract system in the Niitya Annadanam Wing of the 3 respondent Temple by paying regular remuneration.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 33315 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportofthewritpetition,the High Court may be pleased to continue the petitioners as Labour on contract system in Nitya Annadanam Wing of the 3'^respondentTempleby suspending the Tender Notice No. 1/2015, dated 15-062015issuedbythe 2"' respondent, so far as the Nitya Annadanam building of the 3' respondent Temple is concerned pending disposal ofthemainWritPetition
tr ‘
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KOPPARTHI SUMATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 &2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS(AP) Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI. T BALAJI The Court made the following: ORDER
1
%
APHC010108742015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25670/2015
Between:
Gollu Satyanarayana, and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petltioner(S):
1.KOPPARTH1 SUMATHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.TBALAJ1
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article226 of the
Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
3
services through modern methods, for disengaging the services of the petitioners. Therefore, requested this Court to close the writ petition.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court as and when the cause survives. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also
stand closed.
Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
csb
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.25670 of 2015
OF AND^
o
S 1 9 MAH 2025 M
Currant Seelion
Or '• v-
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Gollu Satyanarayana and Others
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Swamy Devasthanam
V.SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
