The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking reinstatement and salary payment. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati permitted the withdrawal of the petition on 06/09/2024 and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is accorded. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ' (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA ''
WRIT PETITION NO: 29889 OF 2015
Between:
N.Lakshmikantha Reddy, S/o.N.Pratap Reddy, Aged about:40years,Occ: Attender, Department of Chemistry, Yogi Vemana University,Kadapa,YSR Kadapa District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourt may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaringtheactionof the Respondents No.2 not paying the monthly salary of the petitioner reinstated as per proceedings No.YVU/N.T.Estt/N.L.K.R-Suspension revoke and reinstated/2015 Dt:11-03-2015 as illegal,arbitraryandagainst Art.14, 16, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India andconsequentlydirectthe
I
ft..
2nd respondent to pay the monthly salary of the petitioner till he attains superannuation
I.A, NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 38703 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pay the monthlysalaryofthe petitioner from the date of reinstatement into serviceasperproceedings No.YVUM.T. Estt/N.L.K.R- Suspension revoke and reinstated/2015Dt;11- 03-2015 to till this month and continue to pay the monthly salary regularly pending disposal of the above Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI NAGARAJU NAGURU
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI T NIRANJAN, SCFOR UNIVERSITY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION(AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER:
A
APHC010243692015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 29889/2015
Between:
N.lakshmikantha Reddy ,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
...RESPONDENT(S)
1.NAGARAJU NAGURU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1 .TENEPALLI NIRANJAN (SC FOR Y V UNIVERWSITY))
2.G VS KISHORE KUMAR
3.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up today, Mr. Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this WritPetitionshallstand
closed.
Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Smb
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.29889 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
N Lakshmikantha Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Registrar, Yogi Vemana University
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
