Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 and an application under Section 151 CPC seeking release of bills amount under RAD grant and permission to withdraw. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition accordingly with no order as to costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2792 OF 2024
Between:
Syamatam Dhanalakshmi, W/o Ramachandra Reddy, Aged about 44 Years, 1-123, Egavakalladu, Kolamasanapalli Village, Palamaneru Mandal, Chittoor District, A.P.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents herein not releasing the total bills amount worth of Rs.29,17,100/- (Rupees Twenty nine lakhs seventeenthousandandone hundred only) with interest @ 12 percent p.a., as per the Judgment of this Honble Court In W.P. No. 19525/2021 (W.P. No. 10038/2021 and Batch) dated 05.10.2021 under grant of Rainfed Area Development (RAD) to the petitioner till today after Implementation of the Horticulture crops plantation programme in ADA (S.C) Punganur Division, Chittoor District and causing heavy loss with Interest even though the work was completedwithintimeas illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 16 and21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to release and pay the total bills amount of Rs.29,17,100/- (Rupees Twentyninelakhsseventeen thousand and one hundred only) with Interest under grant of Rainfed Area Development (RAD) forthwith to the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 20?d
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i m support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release and pay the total bills amount worth of Rs.29,17,100/- (Rupees Twenty nine lakhs seventeen thousand end one hundred only) with Interest under grant of Rainfed Area Development (RAD) forthwith to the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1,3 to 8: GP FOR AGRICULTURE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING
The Court made the following: ORDER
V.,
APHCO10047632024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
[3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO; 2792/2024
Between:
Syamatam Dhanalakshmi • • • PETITIONER
AND
The State of AP and Others
• • • RESPONDENT(S)
The Court made the following:
1
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
\
to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents herein not releasing the total bills amount worth of Rs.29,17,100/ (Rupees Twenty nine lakhs seventeen thousand and one hundred only) with interest 12% p.a., as per the Judgment of this Hon’ble Court In W.P.No. 19525/2021 (W.P.No.10038/2021 & Batch) dated 05.10.2021 under grant of Rainfed Area Development (RAD) to the petitioner till today after Implementation of the Horticulture crops plantation programme in ADA (S.C.) Punganur Division, Chittoor District and causing heavy loss with Interest even though the work was completed within time as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to release and pay the total bills amount of Rs.29,17,100/- (Rupees Twenty nine lakhs seventeen thousand and one hundred only) with Interest under grant of Rainfed Area Development (RAD) forthwith to the petitioner...."
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedcounsel appearing for the respondents.
- Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learnedcounsel for the petitioner stated that the respondents have already paid an amount of Rs. 29,17,100/- to the petitioner and inviewofthesame requested to withdraw the writ petition.
- Permission is accorded.
2
There 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECT|6|^ OFFICER
To,
3 Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING, HIGH COURTOF ANDHRA PRADESH [OUT]
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED:12/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.2792 of 2024
r 15 OCT 2C2T I
^ Current Section
^ D M !> o
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking release of bills amount under RAD grant should be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Syamatam Dhanalakshmi
State of A.P.
State of Andhra Pradesh
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
