The Single Judge bench dismissed a writ petition challenging proceedings related to employment promotion as infructuous holding the cause did not survive any further.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
••V
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT I; 3 ..rI 'T.
X
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 23781 OF 2003
Between:
C.Chinna Subba Redddy S/o.Pulla Reddy, Incharge HeadMaster Srimitta Malleswara Swamy Oriental High School, PulivendIa, Cuddapah District.
... Petitioner
AND
... Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
direction more particularly one in the be pleased to issue a Writ, order or the G.O.Ms.No.167 dated 9.3.1984 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring unconstitutional and consequently set aside the as illegal, arbitrary in RC.No.5389/B8/2003 dated proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in 22.10.2003. I A. NO: 2 QF 2QQ3(WPMP. NO: 29870 OF 20031
that in the circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying support of the petition, the High Court may be stated in the affidavit filed in in RC.No.5389/B8/2003 pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings in dated 22.10.2003 issued by the 3rd respondent.
I A NO: 3 OF 7nn4/WPMP. NO: 13299 OF 20041
151 CPC praying that in the circumstances Petition under Section stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe respondent to promote the petitioner as Head Master pleased to direct the which the 5th respondent in in the 4th respondent school w.e.f the date on Head Master with all Consequential benefits. appointed as
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 10705 OF 2004)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe in terms of Judgment and order passed in wp pleased to dispose of the wp dt 24-0-995 directing the respondents to consider thecaseofthepetitioner for the post of Head Master in 4th respondent school.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI E SAMBASIVA PRATAP
Counsel for Respondent No.5: K JAGAN MOHAN REDDY
Counsel for Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following: Order
APHC010127462003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 23781/2003
Between:
C.chinna Subba Redddy S/o.pulla Reddy ...PETITIONER
AND
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
2.K JAGAN MOHAN REDDY
3.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
4.G RAMA MOHAN REDDY
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
2
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.Theresha.
be no order as to costs.
As 3i sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shal]_standclosed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// V, Vi
SECTION OFFICER
To,
- Two CCS ot GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
NAP, NF Sec
HIGH COURT
'v.-
DATED:23/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.23781 of 2003
■fe 0 5 MAK 2025
Current Section
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition survives for further adjudication.
Whether the High Court should issue a Writ of Mandamus to set aside certain proceedings.
C. Chinna Subba Redddy
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
